Archive for January, 2010

The President’s Proposed Spending Freeze

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

The President’s proposed spending freeze

In his state of the Union speech last night, President Obama proposed a spending freeze as a solution to the rising national debt. He said that this would affect discretionary government programs, but that Medicaid, Medicare and spending related to national security would not be affected. He said that this freeze would go into effect in 2011 when the economy would be stronger.
In reading this segment of the President’s State of the Union speech, I generally agree with the proposal. I wrote an article on December 10, 2009 criticizing H. J. Res.45 which authorized the increase of the national debt. It is refreshing to hear the President in his State of the Union speech advocate a curtailment of government spending and say that we need to examine our money management and eliminate the spending which is not appropriate. You’d think he read my article! I know he didn’t; so I won’t flatter myself. This idea goes back much further than my December 10 article.
Although I generally agree with the sentiment, I wonder about its implementation. Good financial management is the sort of thing that households across the nation are practicing, but here, we are talking about a household that is around three hundred million strong. Everyone is clamoring for their share of the pie. Another concern I have is the health care being considered in Congress. This bill carries with it a large price tag, and if it passes, I am concerned that the national debt may increase despite the spending freeze. I hope that the President can implement the spending freeze equitably and that the freeze will recognize our most important priorities. At the same time, I hope that it will at least stop the growth of the national debt. These are some of the challenges the President will face.
If this spending freeze is implemented, bills on our expenditures will come before the Congress. This is where Politivote fits into the situation. We will obtain the data on these bills and anyone can register for free and vote for or against these bills. We will then send the aggregate of these votes to legislators. Now is the time to be involved to make sure that the government recognizes your priorities.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace

The Scott Brown Election: Democracy Put into Action

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Over the past week, Republican Scott Brown’s victory in Massachusetts has been a hot item in the news. This was a startling upset because Massachusetts traditionally has been known as a democratic state. Now, however, one of its senate seats has gone to the Republicans. This is an example of people taking control over their politics. Regardless of the traditionally democratic leaning of the state, the people’s voice was heard.
This year is an election year, and we at Politivote encourage people to participate in our government. We invite everyone to come to our site, register, and participate. The people who participated in the Massachusetts election have set the example for all of us to get politically involved. The election of Scott Brown shows that despite of all predictions, if the people want something to happen, and they let their voice be heard, it will happen. The odds were against Scott Brown’s winning the election. Yet, he won because enough people wanted that to happen and got involved politically. The purpose of this article isn’t to promote Scott Brown’s agenda, but merely to show that the people can influence the course of politics through active participation.
I encourage the reader to follow the example of the citizens who were involved in the Massachusetts election and register for Politivote. We provide another opportunity to let your voice be heard. We accumulate federal and state legislation and we have an instrument on the site that can be used to vote on the legislation. We store the votes on these bills, and will eventually send them to federal and state legislators. Politivote can insure that the voice of the people finds its way to our representatives and accomplishes what the people want.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace

Fear or Freedom

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

Today, KSL featured a story in which a teenaged Jewish boy was praying using boxes that contained scrolls while on an airplane. This caused anxiety on the part of the captain and crew, and the plane was diverted to Philadelphia where the FBI was waiting with bomb sniffing dogs. Eventually, the boy and his sister were cleared and allowed to resume their travels.
This story reminds me of the aftermath of school shootings when children would get into trouble for bringing toy guns to school. When a major tragedy happens, sometimes, we allow fear of its repetition to take control over our daily activities. We seem to live in a climate of fear which is harmful to the freedom of our nation. The knowledge of a terrorist attack causes us to be more suspicious of people. On the other hand, there is the other extreme of being unaware of situations that can cause harm or threaten lives. At some point, we need to ask ourselves if our fear is inhibiting our freedom.
The constitution is an example of this. There is a risk for some of the rights it provides. The freedom of speech carries with it the fear that someone may say something that is offensive. Thus, people may work to inhibit that freedom. The right to bare arms carries with it the fear that people will kill each other with those weapons. The signers of the Declaration of Independence took the risk of being ostracized and possibly hanged for treason. In some of the cases listed above, these fears were well founded. Yet, we don’t advocate throwing out the constitution, and the signers of the Declaration of Independence are remembered as heroes.
It has been my experience that fear stifles freedom. Fear can immobilize people. It can cause them to not want to leave the house. It can prevent them from expressing an opinion. It can prevent people from making friends, or applying for a new job, or moving to a new place. In effect, it can keep someone from living a fulfilling life. They thus become its prisoners. They are not free to make choices that involve some risk because they might fail or be hurt by that choice even if the choice has the potential of making their circumstances better.
I am concerned that as we allow fear to become a part of our culture, our freedom will be limited. We may find that there is an abridgement of the basic freedoms of speech and of religion. We may find ourselves shackled with excessive laws and unnecessary regulations. Even as fear can immobilize an individual, it can inhibit the freedom of a nation.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace

S. Res. 188: a Fabulous Piece of Sports Writing

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

On June 17, 2009, S. RES.188 was passed. This resolution congratulates the Las Angeles Lakers for winning the NBA championship of 2009. I am deeply gratified to read the stirring account of this team’s victory over Orlando! I am also gratified to read the stirring account of how this team defeated the Houston Rockets and the Utah Jazz! Evidently, we have some Laker fans in the senate. A regret I have is that the bill passed without amendment. I am disappointed that Senator Hatch as my duly elected representative didn’t do his job and amend the bill with how the Utah Jazz beat the Lakers in a regular season game.
The usefulness of the resolution ends right here! I am absolutely baffled why such a frivolous piece of legislation is passed by the senate which ought to spend its time on more important issues. This isn’t the reason I elect my senators. I am confident that Californians, laker fans though they may be, would rather have legislation of more consequence. I have seen other bills in which Congress bestows honors on members of the entertainment industry. The recognition and praise that the fans give these entertainers ought to be sufficient.
This piece of legislation is the reason for Politivote. We need to question the legislation being considered and passed at both the federal and state levels. If someone has a reason for supporting S. RES. 188, they have the freedom to support it. They also have the freedom to express their support through commenting. I, on the other hand, am disturbed by the bill because it represents a distraction from the business of the Senate.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace

The Political Party: a Tool or a Tyranny

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

An article appeared on ksl.com on January 2, 2009 about the trouble the Democrats are having and are expecting to have this coming election year. The Democrats are in danger of losing Congressional seats to the Republicans. Reading this article causes me to reflect again on the important role political parties have played in our country’s history. In my article of July 18, 2009, I used George Washington’s farewell address to argue that political parties are inherently bad for the country, and that while we cannot get rid of the party system altogether, we should avoid the spirit of the political party.
As I read this article, I am led to think that it is a little more complicated. Through out our history as a nation, control of the government has changed hands between two major political parties. First, it was the Democrats and the Whigs. Then, when the Whig party was dissolved in the 1850’s, the Republican Party took its place. When Americans tire of the rule of one party, they elect members of the other party to Congress or the presidency of the United States. Through out the twentieth century, other countries have allowed themselves to be controlled by one party with disastrous consequences for the nation. Nazi Germany and Communist Russia were two examples of this. However, in the United States, our democratic system of government has allowed us to be governed by a two party system and not let one party maintain power permanently. Ultimately, it is the American people who control the party system instead of the party system controlling the people.
However, one weakness of the political party remains. Just as, in other countries, political parties had the tendency to unite the people, in our country; they have the potential to divide us as a nation. It has been shown that no one party will maintain permanent control over this nation as long as there is no radical change in its form of government. However, we need to make sure that our American citizenship takes priority over party loyalty. To me, this is one of the main problems that plague the Congress and the presidency. I have the impression that politicians are too busy trying to score points for their own parties and they lose site on the welfare of the nation.
We at politivote claim no party loyalty. We aim to encourage and facilitate greater political involvement on the part of our citizens. The single most important reason for the vitality of our nation’s political system has been the participation of citizens. As long as citizens vote and as long as citizens focus on the good of the nation as their number 1 priority, the political party will be a tool of the American people instead of the American people becoming a tool of the political party.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace