Posts Tagged ‘Judgment’

Love or Hate: our perceptions on politicians

Saturday, April 10th, 2010

Recently, I was listening to a discussion on CSpan and Sarah Paylan and her chances at the presidency were the topics of discussion. A caller made a comment that she would never be president, but she was someone that most people could adore. I thought about how I feel about most politicians, and my first thought was, “I try not to adore anyone in politics.” The other side of the coin is that I try not to demonize anyone in politics.
As we watch our congressmen and the president or the contenders for these positions, we hear them make speeches and read about the votes they make for and against legislation. We watch how they handle interviews with journalists. At times when the media is in the mood for scandal, we get to hear about extramarital affairs. This wealth of information at times causes us to despise or love politicians.
The media has become the conduit through which most of us receive our information about elected officials, yet we should remember that this information is delivered in such a way that plays on our emotions. The purpose is to persuade us to love one elected official and hate another. Even in speeches, some politicians have an appeal that is designed to play on the emotion of the listener. The problem is when we let our emotions get in the way of good judgment. When we demonize a president or congressman, we tend to overlook the contributions they make to our nation. Conversely, when we become attached to them, we may tend to overlook some decisions they make that are a detriment to our nation.
It sometimes annoys me when I hear someone say that they just hate some one in office, without giving any specific reasons. An example of this is Bill and Hillary Clinton. It seems that many people dislike them, but no one can point to something specific that causes them to feel this way. When someone asks about my opinion on an elected official, I might respond with, “well, I like what he’s doing with regard to.…” I usually talk about the things they are doing that pertain to their office. To me, saying that I love or hate a president or any other elected official is too simplistic. I want the conversation to focus more on the job they are doing as elected officials. If they are doing a good job, I will vote for them. If not, I will vote for someone else.

Objectivity is one of the strengths of Politivote. We exist merely to impart information on candidates or pieces of legislation. We do not favor either end of the political spectrum. We want people to have information so that they can make informed decisions on the legislation being considered and the officials they elect.

Gaining a Perspective on our Presidents

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

The head of our executive branch is arguably the single most scrutinized individual in our nation. From conversations at the dinner table to speeches in Congress, millions of Americans examine and debate his actions and policies. Throughout our history, it has always been this way, but now more than ever, we have more access to information on both the public and private life of the President through television, radio, and the internet. The president always has his supporters and detractors. The former will do their best to defend the president’s policies, and the latter will attack the head of the executive branch. During this exchange, the opposing groups continue to hurl charges and countercharges at each other.
Amidst this constant chaos, it is important to gain a perspective of our presidents throughout history. In studying our president’s predecessors, I always try to figure out how our current president will be rated in comparison to those who previously occupied his position. Will he be considered one of the great presidents, or one of the worst? Many Americans already have formed their own judgment on this question. However, it is important to remember that some of the great presidents were not well liked while they were in office. In studying the history of our presidents, I cannot find one who was immune from criticism. Even the presidents we most revere such as Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt endured their share. In gaining a perspective on our president, we should remember that the consequences of his actions may not be fully understood and appreciated years after the president leaves office. As for rating the presidents, historians use two criteria: the difficulty of the circumstances of the nation, and the president’s response to those circumstances. It takes a considerable amount of time for us to realize the full impact of the president and the context in which he worked. It is difficult to rate our most recent presidents because new revelations about the president’s decisions and the context in which those decisions were made always will surface, and our opinion will change over time.
While it is difficult to have a clear perspective on our current president, we should actively participate in our government. Most of us will not communicate directly with the president, but our congress can be the conduit through which the will of the people is expressed. The bills presented to Congress will need to come before the president for veto or passage. We can facilitate the passage or abolishment of legislation. Through Politivote, we can make our feelings known concerning legislation, and this will dictate what bills make it to the president to sign into law. I would encourage the reader to register with Politivote and use this site to be a part of this process.

Global Online Freedom Act: a Bill for Politivote

Friday, October 23rd, 2009
The Internet across the world

The Internet across the world

Recently, H.R.2271 was considered before Congress. This bill will promote freedom on the internet by first encouraging businesses not to cooperate with foreign governments to enact censorship on the internet. Another provision of the bill is that it asks the President of the United States to seek agreements with other countries to safeguard internet freedom.

This bill is well advised because it will do much to promote the free expression of ideas. The internet is the medium used by Politivote to accomplish our goal of simplifying democracy and making it more accessible to every citizen in this nation. Our democracy was founded on the principles of self-government. In order to have self-government, it is essential to have freedom of speech. Without this crucial freedom, self-government is dead. Of all the mediums used in this society, the internet does the most to promote free speech. The reason is that anyone can put anything on the internet. Unlike TV and radio, you don’t have to get your own show. There is no one to screen ideas or sensor them. Anything can be put on the net where it can be read by the general public and we can decide for ourselves whether or not we want to accept it as fact. This gives us as consumers of information the opportunity and responsibility to exercise our judgment in what information we choose to consume. No one will screen it for us. In using the internet, we have the sole responsibility to make sure that which we consume will benefit us. This is the main reason that I support this bill. The bill promotes an environment in which the citizen has a wealth of information available to them, and the citizen decides on the information he or she will use or discard. The freedom of access to ideas and information is the essence of self-government.